|       
     
    
     
     Yet, this access to quality
    leads one to question if varying prices among dating services create a
    dating elitism that separates the working man from the "professional"?
    If so, this elitism is the natural selection of the dating services world;
    it is a natural selection predicated on access, which is often predicated on
    money. Of course, this is nothing new. Social Darwinism has always favored
    someone over another, whether for looks, money, talent, or (heaven help the
    average people), all three. Having
    been a teacher, I certainly considered myself a professional, but not one
    that could necessarily fork out thousands of dollars for a pre-arranged
    lunch. Thus, I was eliminated from that dating pool and forced to find
    another place to swim. Let's just hope it's not the bottom of the bowl. 
    Consideration of this
    elitism proffers another side too. Free dating web sites will most likely
    attract people who do not choose to, or who cannot afford to pay for
    exposure. This implies, of course, an unstable economic situation (Get a
    job!) or a lack of seriousness about meeting someone for a relationship (No,
    I don't want to have IM sex with you!). Thus, those looking for Mr. or Ms.
    Right, might infer that it's not worth the "price" paid in lost time
    searching for quality. 
    
    
     
     | 
  
  
    |       
     
    
     
    After all, once one's
    paycheck predetermines the dating possibilities, isn't it really about
    choices, standards, and desire? While two nights of dining out or going for
    drinks could not pay for a year membership to some dating services, it could
    easily pay for a month of most online subscriptions. 
    "Match.com was my first
    choice five years ago. At that time there were only a few options for online
    dating. Because Match.com wouldn't let you do much without paying, I found
    they had a higher class of people to choose from than Yahoo personals,"
    says one single, thirty-eight year-old woman who has used Match on and off
    for five years. 
      
     | 
  
  
    |       
     So, what does all this talk
    of cost add up to? That I can't say. It's only of value to those who
    press forward with the optimism of Sex & the City's Charlotte. It's
    meaningful to the few who don't give up despite the long walk alone to the
    car at the close of a fruitless evening, the unreturned phone call, or the
    disappointing kiss.
      |